My goal as a regenerative medicine physician is to know what research backs up the various treatments that I offer to patients. And actually it is more than just a goal, it is my duty to know. If I cannot find some evidence that a therapy is beneficial, then I shouldn't be doing it. As a doctor, I am responsible for being informed and only offering safe and efficacious solutions for my patients.
This blog is my effort to compile the data that I find into an easy-to-understand synopsis for patients looking to educate themselves. The intent is to summarize the research and give an educated opinion about it. And many of these blogs stem directly from questions that patients have asked me.
Along that line, I receive many inquiries into cellular therapies, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cells. These 2 techniques involve using a patient's own cells to elicit a healing response within their own body. They are very safe as there are no foreign substances used, no pharmaceuticals, no implants. But there is some question as to which is better, or in what circumstances to use one therapy over the other.
Obtaining PRP is relatively simple, involving only a blood draw from the patient. The blood is then put through a series of spins in a centrifuge in order to obtain a highly concentrated sample of platelets and growth factors within the plasma. This liquid product can then be injected into a joint, tendon, ligament, muscle, or the like, in order to help facilitate healing and pain relief. There is rarely any downtime, and only minimal side effects associated with it.
Obtaining stem cells is a bit more involved, requiring a minor procedure to obtain either fat cells through manual liposuction or occasionally bone marrow via a bone marrow harvest. These both require incisions and some post-operative care due to the fact that these are both more invasive than just obtaining blood. Also, the process involved in isolating the stem cells is more complex and time-consuming. This directly relates to more expense for the patient.
Given these factors, using PRP tends to be the first recommendation for many patients. Obviously this depends on each patient and the specific medical issue being addressed. That being said, the benefits associated with PRP along with the low risk and ease of obtaining and preparing the sample make this an ideal first therapeutic option. Also, the monetary cost to the patient is much less when compared to a stem cell procedure. There are some situations however, where PRP may not be appropriate. Again, the decision must be made after careful consideration between you and your physician. Learn the pros and cons of each and ask questions. The final choice will ultimately depend on your specific circumstances.
Irrespective of receiving daily oral or future in jectable depot therapies, these require health care visits for medication and monitoring of safety and response. If patients are treated early enough, before a lot of immune system damage has occurred, life expectancy is close to normal, as long as they remain on successful treatment. However, when patients stop therapy, virus rebounds to high levels in most patients, sometimes associated with severe illness because I have gone through this and even an increased risk of death. The aim of “cure”is ongoing but I still do believe my government made millions of ARV drugs instead of finding a cure. for ongoing therapy and monitoring. ARV alone cannot cure HIV as among the cells that are infected are very long-living CD4 memory cells and possibly other cells that act as long-term reservoirs. HIV can hide in these cells without being detected by the body’s immune system. Therefore even when ART completely blocks subsequent rounds of infection of cells, reservoirs that have been infected before therapy initiation persist and from these reservoirs HIV rebounds if therapy is stopped. “Cure” could either mean an eradication cure, which means to completely rid the body of reservoir virus or a functional HIV cure, where HIV may remain in reservoir cells but rebound to high levels is prevented after therapy interruption.Dr JAMES Herbal Medicine makes me believes there is a hope for people suffering from ACUTE MYELOFIBROSIS, ALZHEIMER's symptoms, BREAST CANCER, DIABETES, HAIR LOSS AND HAIR TREATMENT, KIDNEY DISEASES, LEUKEMIA, MYELOID LEUKEMIA, STEM CELL TREATMENT,Parkinson's disease,Schizophrenia,Cancer,Scoliosis,Fibromyalgia,Fluoroquinolone Toxicity
ReplyDeleteSyndrome Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.Fatal Familial Insomnia Factor V Leiden Mutation ,Epilepsy Dupuytren's disease,Desmoplastic small-round-cell tumor Diabetes ,CARDIAC disease,Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease,Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Ataxia,Arthritis,Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis,Alzheimer's disease,Adrenocortical carcinoma.Asthma,Allergic disease HIV & Aids,Herpes ,Copd,Diabetes,Hepatitis,I red about him online how he cured Tasha and Tara so I contacted him on >drjamesherbalmix@gmail.com< even talked on >whatsapps +2348152855846< believe me it was easy I drank his herbal medicine for two weeks and I was cured just like that isn't Dr James a wonder man? Yes he is! I thank him so much so I will advise if you are suffering from one of those diseases. Please do contact him and get permanent treatment with his powerful herbal mix now he's a good man.